The Phoenix sent each candidate the same questions. Here is how Nick Walsh answered:
What prompted you to run in this byelection?
I decided to run after spending the past year doing independent, fact-based research on several major issues facing Peachland, particularly long-term infrastructure decisions and public process. As a retired policy and technical analyst, I’m used to working with complex information and translating it into clear, accessible explanations. I’ve had many residents reach out asking for clarity rather than slogans. This byelection provides an opportunity to bring that research-driven, citizen-focused approach directly to council.
What is the biggest issue facing Peachland today?
The biggest issue is trust—specifically, ensuring that residents can clearly understand how major decisions are being made, what options are genuinely on the table, and what the long-term financial and governance implications are. Peachland is growing, it needs to grow, and growth requires careful, transparent planning. When information is incomplete or difficult for citizens to access, it creates confusion and division. Restoring confidence through openness and clear communication is essential.
What is the most important thing you want to accomplish between now and the October 17 municipal election?
My priority is to improve transparency and accountability around major decisions, particularly those involving long-term costs or commitments. That means asking informed questions at council, ensuring assumptions are clearly stated, and encouraging better public access to information. Even in a short time, a councillor can help set a higher standard for how decisions are explained to the public.
Any public campaign events planned?
I’m focusing primarily on direct engagement—conversations with residents, responding to questions, and sharing clear written information online. If any public meetings or informal meet-and-greets are scheduled, details will be shared through local channels and social media. My goal is accessibility rather than large campaign events.
***
